Subscribe  |  Login  

Off the Cuff

Cheap Politics, Martyrs and History

Wednesday, April 07, 2010 
Comments: 3
There has recently been a huge and somewhat understandable outcry over the subject of struggle anthems and their place in the new South Africa.

This storm has been created largely by ANCYL President Julius Malema singing “dubula ibhunu” at a gathering with students. Farming and right-wing organisations were quick to jump on Malema’s back to demand an apology and move to have singing of such sings banned.

This whole mess reminds me of a debate that rears its head in rugby every so often. That being the waving of the old South African national flag.

The critics of such an act always point to the fact that it shows a rejection of the new South Africa and that those who do are harking back to a time of racial oppression and in the process are spitting in the faces of those who fought and gave their lives to deliver SA from darkness. Supporters say it is a part of South Africa and is inextricably intertwined with the growth and support of rugby amongst especially Afrikaans speaking South Africans.

There were moves to ban the old flag but fortunately sanity prevailed. The biggest argument against banning the old flag was the very sober view that a ban would only serve to “martyr” the flag and what it represented. When you have a minority that feels marginalised (rightly or not) such heavy handed punitive measures will only ever serve to harden their resolve and sense of injustice.

Likewise with the struggle anthems. For a lot of people they represent a time when South Africans of different races put aside their racial, social and cultural differences to unite against a greater injustice. It was a time of great suffering but above all of that, great hope. Fifteen years into a post apartheid governance era, that hope seems betrayed for most. For some their lives have not changed at all, crime is rampant and the leaders they looked up to seem to have deserted them

Add to that a perceived hardening of racial intolerance (though not yet at the level of apartheid SA) and one can see how struggle songs continue to have such a special place in the hearts of many. Banning the singing of such songs will only serve to further alienate those who feel left behind by the new SA. It will only serve to make the vast majority of black people, those jokers at Cope aside, feel that their history is further marginalised and that they struggle is viewed as an uncomfortable truth. That is not the road SA wants to take. No political party wants to alienate the black majority. Except maybe those that are not even trying to appeal to them.

The fact is, Julius Malema is not the struggle, he barely even has any struggle credentials. Putting a veil on struggle history on account of his actions is an insult to the struggle and its real heroes. Malema’s use of struggle songs appears to have no real basis or motive beyond cheap politicking. He has cunningly found a chord that resonates with the disenfranchised masses. It is the cheapest and nastiest form of politicking.

That is what we should take umbrage with. That is the enemy we must fight. Linking a fat man singing off key at a campus to a farm murder phenomenon as old as crime in this country is no different to what he himself is doing. It is cheap and reactionary.

Fanning the flames of paranoia and prejudice. And making Julius seem more important than he actually is.

When Bok van Blerk sang of General Koos de la Rey it was he says as homage to his culture and history. When that welling of emotion is appropriated by racist elements as their rallying call it is nothing short of churlish and short sighted to reduce that history to a mere instrument of racial intolerance. That is why de la Rey should not and could not ever have been banned. That is why the old SA flag is not illegal. Our collective history is bigger than individuals who seek to bend it to their narrow interests. We must not be swayed away from that view.

Instead of making martyrs out of the lowest common denominator, lets seek to engage and talk with one another. We’ve had us vs. them and “swart gevaar” before, and we all know how that turned out.



Name 
Surname 
Email Address 
Contact Nr.  
Comment 
max 250words
 Register me for the newsletter 
 I accept the terms & conditions of the site 
6550 Peter Moss  [ Friday, April 16, 2010 | 5:44:23 PM ]
Malema is nothing more than an agent provocature sent to incite racial and ethnic hatred.

The ANC do not do anything that is unplanned or undesired. When did you ever see an ANC power member do anything wrong that was not immediately censured or disciplined?
6506 mina branwen  [ Friday, April 09, 2010 | 3:42:29 PM ]
There's a a huge difference between a symbol and a direct incitement to violence against a specific group of people. Personally, I think the old flags are archaic bits of history that should have be forgotten, and eventually they will be, but ultimately they are just symbols - to the people who still fly them, they're symbols of culture and heritage and pride and whatever else, to others symbols of oppression. But ultimately the meaning of those symbols lies in the eye of the beholder.

There's no such ambiguity around a phrase like "shoot the boer". It's a direct instruction, an incitement to violence, and while the intent might be metaphorical, the fact is that alot of people can and will interpret those words literally. Words and rhetoric are powerful tools - just think of the kind of influence Hitler, or Pol Pot, or Idi Amin have had. Yes, later they had their security police and SS and other instruments of violence to enforce their will, but before that, all they had was a podium and a message - a message they managed to convince enough people of to gain real, temporal power.

As for the comparison of the old anthem to that particular struggle song, come on. From what I can remember of it, nowhere does it instruct people to attack others. It's a hymn that waxes lyrical about the natural beauty of the country and self-congratulates Afrikaners about how strong and proud and wonderful they are ... but that's it.

The concerns I have are not with the struggle songs themselves. They are indeed a part of our history and heritage. But those struggle songs that incite violence have no place in the new South Africa. In the same way that we condemned ET and the AWB's rhetoric and politics, any politicians who would call for violence against members of our society, whatever their "intended meaning", have no place here.

Mina.


Mina.
6497 Mntungwa Mbulazi  [ Wednesday, April 07, 2010 | 11:20:29 PM ]
Cheep politicking indeed!

Double standards as well! No-one is calling of the khakhi clad demonstrators at the trial to stop throwing insults at F W de Klerk. They are singing die stem and waving the 'vier kleur' and old apartheid flag.

Let mr Terreblance rest in peace, and justice take its course.