Out to LunchWhy are US congressmen so hideously ugly?Saturday, June 19, 2010
Comments: 20
I watched BP chief Tony Hayward getting grilled by US legislators last week and the first thought that occurred to me was…God, but these American legislators are ugly men. Their mouths seem to be locked in a permanent sneer, their teeth urgently need the attention of a skilled orthodontist and their lips slobber uncontrollably. My wife thought Tony Hayward looked like a hobbit which isn’t something he would want the 80000 odd employees of BP to agree with I suspect. Personally I thought he looked like a meek schoolboy being ticked off by the teacher and I also thought he was a bit too pathetic for a pommie CEO of one of the world’s largest companies. If I had been Hayward I would have given old slobber lips a bit of a run for his money and asked if he seriously expected me to know what was going on all the time in such a large multinational. To say that the questions from the US congressmen were naïve is to do a serious mis-justice to that word. The questions were mostly plain daft and had a lot more to do with coming mid term elections I reckon than they did with finding out what had gone wrong with the Deepwater Horizon rig or how to sort the problem out. Now, thanks to dithering President Obama and his slobber lipped legislators BP is being painted as an evil capitalist entity that puts profit before safety and really couldn’t give a damn about spilling 60000 barrels of oil a day into the Gulf of Mexico.
There has never, ever been an evil capitalist entity in the US that has put profit before safety or environmental considerations has there? Of course there has and that’s why old slobber lips and his hideous cronies should be told by the Brits to go off and reproduce. Putting $20 billion of shareholder’s fund into an escrow account to compensate those who have suffered from the oil gushing out of the sea bed may make US legislators believe that they have won a victory but it sets a dangerous precedent. At some stage the boot will be on the other foot and it will be a US registered company that has to pay out billions in compensation. Then they will be squealing like stuck pigs. What about McDonald’s putting $20 billion into an escrow account to compensate for all that oil they have spilled into people’s arteries over the years? The most objectionable thing about the US attitude to the BP oil spill is the implication that it could have been avoided. The problems with pumping oil out of the sea bed are, I can only imagine, complex and immense. If the US wasn’t so in love with the automobile there probably wouldn’t be a need to pump quite as much oil or to have to look for it in ever more inaccessible places. But the US is one of the world’s largest users of oil and therefore share some of the responsibility for the leak. BP could quite reasonably argue that if the US didn’t have such an appetite for black gold then they wouldn’t be drilling in the Gulf of Mexico. Quite why BP would want go to all the trouble and expense of setting up the Deepwater Horizon and then cut corners knowing the thing could blow up, belch oil into the sea and wipe billions off the share price of BP is beyond me. It’s an absurd suggestion and the slobber lips know as well as anyone else that this is simply a terrible accident. Just as the explosion of the Challenger 73 seconds after take off in 1986 was a terrible accident, and even though a faulty rubber seal was later suspected to be the cause nobody suggested then that an escrow account should be set up to compensate the victim’s families. The problem in the US (apart from slobber lipped congressmen wanting their 15 minutes of Warholian fame) is the culture of where there’s blame there’s a claim. There’s money to be had from apportioning blame and this case could keep lawyers rich for decades to come. And what do you think most of the slobber lips do for a living? Well, my guess is that many of them are lawyers who haven’t a clue how to get oil out of the seabed but are past masters at getting money out of a large corporate like BP. Tony Hayward is clearly too battle scarred to put up a fight but maybe Bob Dudley, the MD of BP for the Americas and Asia (and a US citizen) could forget the niceties and tell the lawmakers some of the facts of life about the oil industry. Since the BP brand has already taken a beating he has little to lose by standing up to congress.
7662 John Bowman
[ Tuesday, July 27, 2010 | 5:42:43 PM ]
Great to finally know where you are writing again
7458 Rodney Ulyate
[ Monday, July 12, 2010 | 3:53:16 PM ]
Good gawd, David. This sort of mendacity would get you arrested in some nations. Do you ever bother to read the news before commenting on it?
7263 Pat Nolan
[ Thursday, June 24, 2010 | 9:23:13 AM ]
Apparently it isn't all doom and gloom we can now get cans of Sardines in Oil, courtesy of BP.
7261 Dave Tootill
[ Thursday, June 24, 2010 | 5:48:59 AM ]
"Before you accuse me"- Bo Diddley takes over BP in Gulf of Mexico
7256 David Bullard
[ Tuesday, June 22, 2010 | 8:27:22 PM ]
Not just famous Pat....famous on NewsTime....SA's fastest growing website. But seriously....we just like the way you tell it.
7253 pat nolan
[ Tuesday, June 22, 2010 | 12:03:29 PM ]
So I'm famous now, even though I have just copied somebody else's mail on the subject..........The Yanks, silly sods, adding that dispersant which coagulated the oil into globules that then sank, pricks, then they (the US EPA) hesitated to install any barriers in front of the wetlands 'cos they wanted to study what was about to happen- like that makes sense. Much like the US Army with a 70 page manual telling you how to construct a latrine regardless of how bad you need a piss........no body is prepared to put their arse on the line with this one.And anyone who says they can accurately know the rate of oil coming out of that hole per barrels per day are just kidding themselves.
7252 G T
[ Tuesday, June 22, 2010 | 11:25:40 AM ]
Great post David - certainly your most sensible in some time.What the ugly (and mostly dense) congress people don't realise is that by embarrassing BP for political points, they are endangering 22,000 american jobs and the pension values of almost every pension plan on planet earth.Hayward has done himself any favours and is actually quite slappable (not unlike you David) but he does know what doesn't know and is never going to guesstimate answers under oath
7244 David Bullard
[ Monday, June 21, 2010 | 11:45:08 AM ]
Thanks for that Pat.....you make it clear that this is a highly complex and technical matter and certainly not something a bunch of congressmen are qualified to comment on....irrespective of their political ambitions or personal anger. It's too easy to blame BP. Just as it was too easy to blame Toyota for gas pedals sticking and killing people when it was doff drivers who had never heard of the neutral position for a gear change. If I had been BP's spin doctor I would have said at the outset that the company is in uncharted waters and is unable to give any assurances. Interesting that no other oil drillers rushed in to help. Because they didn't want to or because they didn't know how to?
7243 Pat Nolan
[ Monday, June 21, 2010 | 11:16:09 AM ]
This bloke has a brother who is a hydro-geological engineer and a world wide expert on underground horizontal wells. He agrees they screwed up...reminiscent of wells spewing oil up in the air and everyone celebrating underneath...which if it did in real life everyone's arse would be fired between lost oil and environmental penalties that no one can afford to let happen.it was all about drilling protocol.....argued for by Trans Oceanic, the drilling contractor, and argued against by BP with BP insisting they switch from drilling mud to just drilling with sea water. Mud weighs considerably more than water and at those pressures 1000's of feet below could have saved the day. The mud engineer on the rig is the most important guy there. Apparently BP insisted to swop to water.....unfortunately the mud engineer was one of the eleven that died. The hole blew out then hesitation about closing the blow out, waiting for authorisation from HQ, it came but the rig had gone by then as well as the control room to operate the blow out preventer. At that point everyone knew they were screwed.Despite BP's culpability the USA Government ain't looking too bright here either.Bottom line there will be finger pointing galore with this one. My money says the guy that needs to hang is the BP guy who made them switch to sea water for drilling fluid. By the way he refused to show up for the congressional hearing citing poor health. Yeah, right I would be sick if I were him too.Have a good week.
7242 David Bullard
[ Monday, June 21, 2010 | 10:01:10 AM ]
OK Door Knob....I'll allow that it was an error on your part and not due to emotion overtaking reason. By the way, I have no problems with anyone objecting to what I write. That's why I do it. I'll promise you a better one next week and consider my wrist slapped.
Pamela....is it really logical that BP's past alleged transgressions should automatically make them guilty of this one? And if their track record is so bad why are the Yanks letting them drill at all? And don't you have a teensy bit of scepticism that tells you that those millions of dollars of fines are simply the cost of doing business? Don't worry....I've researched but I don't have the same agenda as CNN. And the final straw is having a go at Tony Hayward because he has gone sailing in the clean water of The Solent. That shows you that this is all about politics and the sweet smell of litigation.
7240 Door Knob
[ Monday, June 21, 2010 | 8:29:25 AM ]
I don't find it embarassing as I put 25,000 underneath, so you know it was a simple error. Go back and read it again. I even posted straight afterwards to correct that but clearly someone thought it unimportant, maybe to help you make a weak point. The estimate of 5,000 barrels was never in good faith, it was in dirty stinky, cover it up mode. I am afraid your article blows this week. I usually like them and this is the first time I object, which you clearly don't appreciate. Bend over, take one for the team and come back next week with something better.
7239 Pamela Diamond
[ Monday, June 21, 2010 | 1:52:17 AM ]
I am amazed that a columnist of your intelligence and talent can write a column about the BP oil-spill catastrophe without researching the subject. "There is not a shred of evidence that BP has been negligent"?????? Go back to the drawing board, David, and check out the shocking history of BP's negligence, going back at least to 2000. They have been fined millions of dollars, with at least 4 episodes of other oil-leaks caused by safety mechanisms not put in place. In spite of their disastrous track-record, the records show that they have always opted to put cost before safety, virtually ignoring basic safety mechanisms, and neglecting to maintain their rigs. Why do you think their shares are going down, down, down.Usually, I enjoy your columns enormously. But this one ignores one of the most important basic rules of journalism: Research your subject before you put pen to paper. BBC and CNNTV both did thorough exposes on BP's shameful history of "accidents" last week. Check it out S L O W L Y.The fact is that this oil spill could indeed have been avoided. It is also a fact that BP has caused the most catastrophic environmental disaster in US history through sheer carelessness and crass materialism. They should be made to pay.
7238 David Bullard
[ Sunday, June 20, 2010 | 9:30:48 PM ]
And the involvement of a certain company owned by Republicans in all this???? Was it really BP that cocked up? The guesstimate of 5000 (not five million) barrels at the beginning was in good faith and has grown to 60000 barrels a day. I am a literature buff but also a financial whizz. Check your figures against mine and genuflect. 25000 is NOT five times 5 million.....not in anybody's language. If you offer me a large amount of money it's within my power to delete your embarrassing comment. But it needs to be LARGE
7236 Door Knob
[ Sunday, June 20, 2010 | 6:55:19 PM ]
I can only read Q U I C K L Y. What BP did do was undermine the department responsible for ensuring the proper safety mechanisms are in place to prevent this sort of disaster. Sure it's deep as all hell and a bit of gamble, but that's even more reason to be sure everything is working properly. What they also did do was state that the spill was only 5 million barells a day at the beginnning. Now they are capturing more than 25,000 barrels a day! I'll do the math for you since you are a literature buff, that's 5 times more than BP claimed was the case.
Evidence? The blowout preventer didn't work. Why? Not maintained? Not checked properly by the inspectors prior to use because they were taking bribes and gifts and dinners and a good pomp? There's plenty of hearsay and yet to be proven evidence to take them to task and get big money out them, which will leave less for you to receive from them to write their gorilla PR campaigns.
7235 Mike Trapido
[ Sunday, June 20, 2010 | 2:22:48 PM ]
What people are missing is the following - Law = Investigate Trial = Convict then Sentence. BP = Sentence 20 Billion convicted in the public domain = investigate and then (maybe) trials. Since when are you able reach the conclussions that that Kangeroo oversight committee did without being taken to task for it? The investigation is still underway yet they are happily pronouncing guilt and expecting answers to questions from Hayward. Pathetic!
7232 markus norton
[ Sunday, June 20, 2010 | 1:52:15 PM ]
BS!With your logic it would be OK to let children under the most hazardous conditions produce weapons and then sell them to some war lords in Africa, Burma or you name it, just because there is a demand for weapons.While it is true that the US must change their dependence on oil as one of the root causes, the congressmen are mostly populist and should better pass the various clima change bils, it does not justify BP's actions in any way. Companies as BP, with a criminal record for lack of safety, reckless behavior, and arrogance must be punished to the full extend possible. Such a punishment would never have been possible if the accident would have happened in another part of the world - e.g. in Nigeria where Shell is poluting the Delta since years and nobody really seems to care.Additionally all the managers in charge must be put in jail for several years. Its only then those criminals will learn. Because this catastrophe happened in this very region and has all the media and political attention that such a disaster deserves, it is a chance for real change to happen, and lay the route for clean energy in the future.
7231 David Bullard
[ Sunday, June 20, 2010 | 1:05:31 PM ]
@Door Knob....so you're suggesting that BP deliberarately spilled all that oil in the Gulf of Mexico and caused thousands of people to lose their livelihoods? And the tobacco companies were sued on the basis of "scientific fact". There's not a shred of evidence to suggest that BP were negligent. So 1/10 for comprehension this week I'm afraid. Go back and read it again S L O W L Y.
7230 Pearson Botha
[ Sunday, June 20, 2010 | 10:45:35 AM ]
I think it has to do with their eating habits. When piggy eats at such a LARGE trough piggy tends to evolve slobber lips.But at the same time, we shouldn't criticise the farmer with our mouths full, nor should we criticise oil companies until we are able to wean ourselves of our dependency.
7228 Door Knob
[ Sunday, June 20, 2010 | 8:49:31 AM ]
A US corporate has already been sued, have you forgotten about the tobacco companies. The precedent has already been set. Thousands of people have lost their livelihood that depended on the Gulf for their work. Your article is a pile of crap this time David. Better luck next week.
7227 Anon e Mouse
[ Sunday, June 20, 2010 | 3:14:41 AM ]
Even more amusing than Congress's vote blathering is the Republican party and their in house media channel Fox News's Obama bashing - conveniently forgetting the Bushes close association with big oil and their campaign platform of increasing Gulf exploration.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||